Archive for the ‘Psychology’ Category

Why did ED209 seem such a dreadful course for so many people?

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

Throughout the course everyone seemed to be saying that there was “an awful lot of course” in ED209 but I found that I really didn’t notice that so much until the time came for revision.

Since it’s a research led course you need to try and memorise an enormous number of names of researchers so that you can quote them in the exam. If you were trying to revise the entire course that would equate to several dozen names at least but by that point very few people seemed to even attempt to revise the entire course as it seemed to be an impossible task.

Thus, people selected what they had to revise. In principle that was a fairly easy thing to do in that a guiding principle is that you’re only examined on a topic once. So you could eliminate almost a dozen chapters throughout the three books. However, even that turned out to be problematical as one of the assignment topics turned up on the exam paper thus removing a choice for a lot of people. In fact, this seems to have resulted in almost everyone ignoring the “disturbing behaviour” question and going with the “gender development” one if they were revising book 2.

The structure of the exam paper introduces further complications. There’s one “seen question” that you need to research before the exam and write out during it which is much more difficult than it first appears. The research isn’t so bad but few people these days know how much they could write in an hour and even fewer know how much they could write in an hour under exam conditions. Besides, you basically need to memorise that essay which isn’t that easy either.

Next you need to choose two questions. The questions on offer are a selection of two from each book of the course and you need to answer one question from each book. Thus a lot of people only revised two books and limited themselves somewhat during the exam. Since the third book was the largest and most complex, many people chose from the first two books. This would have been fine but since people were generally limiting the chapters within each book to study and eliminating those chapters already covered by an assignment they had the complication that one of the assignment topics was on the exam paper thus an awful lot of people answered the “gender development” question.

The effect of all this is that getting on for 20% of our merry band didn’t turn up for the exam and around 10% left within the first hour. One glance at the paper was enough for one person and she left after about a minute. Somehow that doesn’t seem right. Yes, people don’t turn up and people leave early in all exams but I’ve never seen it happening in anything like the numbers in ED209.

Overall, the impression is that ED209 is much harder than even the level 3 psychology courses which doesn’t seem right.

Copyright © 2004-2010 by Foreign Perspectives. All rights reserved.

Popularity: 2% [?]

Bookmark:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
Copyright (c) 2004-2010 by Foreign Perspectives. All rights reserved.

ED209: the final 24 hours of revision time

Tuesday, October 20th, 2009

This time tomorrow I’ll be having my very first look at the exam paper.

Today it’s time for last minute skimming over of the material that I didn’t quite get around to learning properly up to now…

There’s the TMA questions to have a look at. Sometimes examiners have a rush of blood to the head and include questions in the very same area or at least in an area that’s similar enough to be helpful in formulating an answer. Not too likely, but then 45 mins or so is all it takes to have a quick look at them.

The course guides are very useful for this course. Reading the chapter summaries and the key theme grids can prompt some thoughts that might be useful in an exam. I’m finding that this is more time consuming than I’d expected: 90 minutes a booklet.

Reading over the answer to the seen question lots of times in amongst all the above seems sensible. In optimistic moments I think that’s an easy way to get, say, 60% on one question which equates to 20% of the overall paper which in turn means that just 30% on each of the other two questions means a pass. Or was that in pessimistic moments?

Finally, there’s leafing over the chapters in the notes that I didn’t cover and/or the course books themselves.

Copyright © 2004-2010 by Foreign Perspectives. All rights reserved.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Bookmark:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
Copyright (c) 2004-2010 by Foreign Perspectives. All rights reserved.

The last few days of ED209

Sunday, October 18th, 2009

As usual, the last few days before an exam are a peculiar mix of panic cramming and looking forwards to the courses coming up.

The ED209 exam is a little peculiar in that of the three questions on the paper, we’ve already been given one (it ain’t as easy as that sounds!) which means that we’ve “only” to choose two more from the six on offer on the day. Unfortunately, it’s not a straight 2 from 6 as you’ve to answer one question on two of the three books on the course.

I find that the seen question is throwing something of a wobbler with my revision. The idea is that you basically treat that question as though it were the seventh assignment which is fine, except that it means you’ve to try and learn off the text of the answer so that you can write it out on the day which seems a bit daft. Not only that, but you’ve to write it, not type it as with the other assignments which also introduces the problem that you need to work out just how much you can write in about an hour.

Slightly odd at this point is that I’ll be branching off into a number of biology courses for a while and leaving the psychology behind for a bit. What’s coming up right away is the Human Biology course (SK277) which looks really interesting and, so far, relatively doable despite it being my first biology course in a very long time indeed. That’ll be followed by Biological Psychology (SD226) which looks like an interesting mix of biology and psychology. Then there’s the summer school: Investigative Biology (SXR270) to round out the coming year.

After that it’s the usual hazy plan at the moment. In theory, I should be doing Exploring Psychology in October but if the biology courses turn out to be as interesting as they appear to be from this distance then I’m thinking of continuing on with Infectious Disease (S320) and its residential, Molecular Basis of Human Disease (SXR376). Possibilities following that include another sequence of biology courses in the form of a new one starting that October, followed by Molecular and Cell Biology (S377) and finally Plants, Pigments and Light (SXR376) if it gets the rumoured extention in its life. And then it would be back into the psychology. But we’ll see.

Copyright © 2004-2010 by Foreign Perspectives. All rights reserved.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Bookmark:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
Copyright (c) 2004-2010 by Foreign Perspectives. All rights reserved.

Bad Behavior has blocked 409 access attempts in the last 7 days.