<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is trying to keep jurors in the dark about information from outside the courtroom still a viable option?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foreignperspectives.com/is-trying-to-keep-jurors-in-the-dark-about-information-from-outside-the-courtroom-still-a-viable-option/2009/04/27/opinion.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foreignperspectives.com/is-trying-to-keep-jurors-in-the-dark-about-information-from-outside-the-courtroom-still-a-viable-option/2009/04/27/opinion.htm</link>
	<description>Travel, expat life, foreign politics mixed with a dab of futurism. As featured on TV and seen on Reuters.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 19:18:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OK, so everyone&#8217;s disgusted, but what if Vanessa George is found not guilty because of that disgust? &#124; Foreign Perspectives</title>
		<link>http://www.foreignperspectives.com/is-trying-to-keep-jurors-in-the-dark-about-information-from-outside-the-courtroom-still-a-viable-option/2009/04/27/opinion.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1847</link>
		<dc:creator>OK, so everyone&#8217;s disgusted, but what if Vanessa George is found not guilty because of that disgust? &#124; Foreign Perspectives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreignperspectives.com/?p=1660#comment-1847</guid>
		<description>[...] worked really well in pre-internet days but is increasingly unworkable in the Internet age as I&#8217;ve said before. As it stands right now there don&#8217;t appear to be any reporting restrictions in place for this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] worked really well in pre-internet days but is increasingly unworkable in the Internet age as I&#8217;ve said before. As it stands right now there don&#8217;t appear to be any reporting restrictions in place for this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
