Foreign Perspectives

Archive for June, 2010

Thus far in the fifth series the planting of forward links has been much more heavy-handed than we’d become used to though the era of the Harold Saxon arc which managed to place untold numbers of forward links that were easy to miss at the time but obvious in hindsight. This series has largely been a series of one-off episodes with little overall linkage other than the heavy handed crack to link them together.

Tonight’s episode had so many separate threads in it that it felt more like a 90 minute episode than the normal length one that it actually was. That’s quite a good thing and one or two of the previous episodes in this series have been quite similar. The linkages might have been too heavy-handed for my liking but it was great to have that “quart into a pint pot” feeling more than once during the series.

Tonight we finally saw a number of threads coming together or rather the Amy Pond and River Song threads starting to come together (although he hasn’t met her for the first time yet). We’ve even a fairly complete pantheon of bad guys in an alliance to save the universe which does seem to be asking for trouble in a seriously big way.

Oh well, only 7 days to find out…

As it turned out, the last minute revision wasn’t really required with the exception of a brief look at the diagram of the digestion system.

Unexpectedly, the digestion question was pretty much  a repeat of the July 2006 question “Write an essay that describes the process of digestion involved in consuming a cheese and tomato sandwich.” replacing “cheese” with “egg” and adding “absorption”. The endocrine, circulation and stress essays were unexpectedly general and looked easy enough to do.

The data handling was loosely based on a stress experiment although you didn’t need to know anything about stress to do it. Unexpectedly again there was a graph to be drawn which represented 1/3rd of the marks for that question. I think it’s fairly safe to say that most people will get over 20 out of the possible 30 marks for it so in theory even 10 out of 30 for the essay plus a couple of short answer questions would be enough for a pass.

The short questions were all over the place as expected. First off was a hard core chemistry question was seemed not to have been a good start for most people. Nobody seemed to have gotten the circle of Willis one in my group and there was another one which I suspect my mark will be close to zero. Other than those two the rest were quite a reasonable mix and largely answerable from my “27 page” summary although not entirely as it turned out (no mention of the circle of Willis for instance, no mention of the chemistry angle either). There was at least one repeat from previous years (advice to a pregnant friend re smoking to have a smaller size baby and easier birth) and one or two others looked kind of familiar so it’s definitely worthwhile looking at past papers for this one.

Strategy-wise I took a brief look at the essay questions first before taking a run through all of the short questions and scribbling out a few keywords that struck me. That worked out really well as I managed to answer a few more of the short questions than I had originally expected to be able to answer as a couple of things came to me whilst I was doing the essay and data handling question. It also gave me a lot of time to do the short question as the essay only took 45 minutes or so and the data handling was about the same.

Quite oddly I felt very comfortable with this exam which is certainly a major change from being all stressed out (as was everyone) with last years Child Development course. Marks-wise I have a pessimistic estimate of 60 but didn’t have enough time to do my optimistic estimate this time (the last few of the short questions took lots of thinking time).

I thought the results for the Understanding cardiovascular diseases and Maths for science weren’t to be out until towards the end of this month so it was a nice surprise to see the Your result for … is now available messages in the inbox this afternoon.

They’re both level one courses so they’re just pass/fail rather than coming with a grading. In both cases there’s supposed to be more information about the course result arriving in the post in a couple of months time.

The cardiovascular course is one of the OU’s medical style courses with heaps of medical terminology to pick up quite early on in the course. It’s also exclusively online tutoring which I could have done with for this particular course but the promised weekly tutorials only ran for two weeks which was a real shame as they were the kind of style which made you think deeper about the course. Nothing at all really on the Maths for science course as it’s one of the short science courses which only offer you a forum to ask questions on although having said that, it’s much more than was on offer the last time I did a science short course.

Anyway that’s another 25 points in the bag for the degree.

Bullying policies are at the sharp end of schooling in that they are there to deal with situations that essentially schools and parents would rather not think about. After all, who wouldn’t like to think of children as being essentially good but maybe needing a little guidance now and again?

With that in mind many of the solutions proposed are based around showing the bully that they’re wrong and talking them back onto the right path. These involve everything from the simple talking to the child through to revealing to them the effect on the feelings of their victim in various ways. Whilst talking does seem the best platform to start with, moving to having the victim reveal their feelings can give a committed bully more ammunition to use against their victim which obviously is less than ideal in the enclosed environment that is a school.

In fact the most effective method of dealing with them appears to be simply telling on the bullies. Thanks to the intimidation that bullies create this needs to go so far as to create a “telling school” whereby everyone feels empowered to tell the teachers about bullying activities. Thus, the victim can rely on someone other than themselves to tell about the bullying they’re subjected to. Downsides are that it could lead to a tell-tale culture if taken to extremes and takes some getting used to.

The other problem that bullying policies can run contrary to some other policies in the school. For instance, what would you do if you saw a child being pounded by another one (ie not a fight)? Most of us would attempt to stop it verbally but that doesn’t always work with a bully so might find themselves needing to pull a bully off a victim but child protection policies often have a “no touching of a child by an adult” clause, so what do you do? That “no touching” clause can sometimes be so strong that if one were to apply it to the letter one would have to allow the bullying to continue until the bully decided to stop. That might sound crazy but is exactly how it’s applied in the school our little guys go to.

You might think that sense would prevail but that “sense” should really be built-in to the policies. After all, if a child were to pull out a knife and start stabbing other kids it seems obvious that you’d intervene to stop them. Doing so is directly contrary to the school policy on child protection though so strictly speaking you’d be required to let the child carry on until they decided to stop. Isn’t that crazy?

The basic problem is that many of these policies are single level with no escalation mechanism built-in. That seems to be largely down to the feeling that policies need to be easy to understand plus parents simply don’t even want to think about the potential of what are essentially junior thugs and how they might need to be dealt with though some process of escalation. In effect, they create policies to deal with their own nice children and don’t allow for those that might not be quite so nice.

What’s really required is an integrated policy with escalation processes built-in that protects victims and potential victims.

All being well, we’re heading off to the maritime festival in Belfast shortly.

It’s one of the original festivals (which include the summer carnival and autumn film festival) that were started before we began to get large numbers of tourists. In fact, the last time we were there was just before the big jump in the number of tourists so it’ll be interesting to see how they cope (not well if last year was anything to go by!).

It’s one of the natural festivals for Belfast in that there’s quite a substantial history of things naval including, of course, the construction of the Titanic. Last time we were at it, the kids wouldn’t go on the baby Titanic that was there as they were sure it would sink! Worth pencilling in is the opening of the major Titanic exhibition in 2012 (the hundredth anniversary of the sailing).

Anyway, must tootle on as we’ve several other things to do today as well as the festival.