Foreign Perspectives

Just when you thought it was finally becoming affordable to get a video camera, they’ve gone and changed the goal posts.

At the moment the cheapest sensible camcorder is coming in around £140 but the cheapest sensible HD model is more like £430 ie getting on for three times the price. Is that extra cost worth it?

One of the main problems that going digital brings is that you just can’t get any more resolution out of the image than you had to begin with. That’s the same with normal film too, of course, but the difference is that normal film has a substantially higher resolution than any digital media you’d realistically be able to afford. The other problem is that display screens are constantly increasing in size. Thus the 13″ screen that was perfectly adequate some years ago has long since been replaced by a 20″ flat screen (equivalent to around 22″ on a non-flat model) and so we can see the limitations of images taken by older technologies.

Bearing in mind that you may well be looking at the images which you record now in, say, 20 years time then the HD devices probably are worth the extra money. You might not notice the difference on the display that you’re using today but chances are that you will notice the difference on the display that you’ll use to view them in even 5 years time.

Now, “all” you have to do is decide whether to go for a miniDV, SD, hard drive or DVD based machine.

That’s actually an easier decision in some ways. The SD card machines are much smaller so if it’s tiny that you want, then that’s the way to go. However, the only technology that doesn’t compress the image is miniDV. Yes, it’s using old-style tapes but if you want the best quality images it’s the one to choose; size-size the machines are about the same as the hard drive and DVD based models.