Archive for the ‘Development’ Category
The Languedoc-Roussillon Region
Just as France is huge, so too are some of the regions within it with the Languedoc-Roussillon area spanning a vast area stretching along the Mediterranean to Provence in the east.
Even we who should know better often think of “the Languedoc” as being countryside with a few hills yet we know that there are proper mountains less than an hour west of us (OK, not in the Languedoc). Similarly, we shouldn’t really expect to be surrounded by castles outside our own little corner of Languedoc-Roussillon. In fact, we’ve hardly explored the eastern edges of the region and have rarely passed Montpellier for that matter.
What’s quite striking is the difference in scenery that you get in travelling as little as 90 minutes from here. Last week, we had a little trip along the coast and came across the lovely Lake Saligou near Clermont L’Herault set in almost alpine scenery. I’m sure that it’s over-run with tourists in the Summer but we had the whole place pretty much to ourselves on a beautiful Spring afternoon.
This is part of our guide to the Pyrenees.
Copyright © 2004-2014 by Foreign Perspectives. All rights reserved.Google pagerank and site value
|
|
As we write this we are languishing at PR2 which is “below average” but then we’ve only had this domain registered for a fairly short time.
What is a little peculiar to look at are some of the values the pagerank prediction tools are producing at the moment for the site.
For me, the most interesting collection of little site monitoring tools is that at iWebTool which has recently changed it’s prediction from a quite respectable PR5 to a PR6. Will we get that next time round though? I can’t honestly see us sitting at PR6 this time next month (the pagerank review is due in early April) but PR5 would be quite nice. They arrive at these predictions basically by looking at the number of backlinks (ie links to) our site. So, when the last pagerank review came up a few months ago we had around 1000 links to our site and thereby ended up with PR2. That was a so-so start though I think we’d have been PR3 if the site had been in operation longer. Now though we have almost 10,000 links to the site picked up by iWebTool and almost as many again when I look at the site via google’s webmaster tools. That’s more links than all the rest of my sites put together so I think it’s fairly safe to say that the minimum PR next time will be 4 and might be 5 if the site is now old enough for it’s age not to act as a drag on the pagerank. Does the pagerank really matter though? Well, the figure quoted by google probably doesn’t but what is obvious is that the pagerank that they’re using internally for FP is much higher than PR2 as the site appears considerably higher in searches than it did a few months ago (or even last month for that matter). Ironically, all this improvement in FP has happened despite me doing virtually no promotion of the site whereas even with a good deal of effort being put into promoting a number of my other sites, none have had the performance improvement that FP has had. So great is that improvement, that I’m toying with the idea of restructuring some of the sites as blogs. |
Hotel and accommodation review sites
The issue of sites posting guest reviews of accommodation has been picked up by Karen over at Europe A La Carte.
Most of the debate to date is on the issue of hotel owners posting bogus and glowing reviews on the likes of Trip Advisor but I suspect that they are few and far between. Looking at it from the other side of the fence so to speak, there are equally problems of negative comments by guests who have never even stayed or who, when something goes wrong, blame everything on the hotel.
Consider a few of the examples that we have seen over the last year.
1. “…in the middle of nowhere…” . It’s certainly quite true that the hotel was in the countryside and not in the city. The guests in question hadn’t even bothered to read the first line of the description which quite clearly states that yet they blamed the hotel for not being in the city-centre location that they really wanted.
2. “…the hairdryer in the room had quite a smell when used…”. They were using the room heater to dry their hair and the smell was their own hair being burnt.
3. “…they didn’t know when we were arriving…”. Not surprising in that the reservation system they’d used doesn’t ask them that question and therefore the hotel don’t know when to expect guests that have used it.
4. “…all the restaurants were closed when they said they’d be open….”. From a guest who hadn’t changed the time on their watch when they arrived in France with the effect that every time they turned up at “1pm” for lunch the restaurants were closed as it was actually 2pm.
5.”…the reception staff weren’t French…”. Try booking into a London hotel and finding any English staff!
Many review sites make checks that the guests have actually stayed there but Trip Advisor appears to take anything that comes with no checks at all. We’ve seen “interesting” reviews by people who clearly have never stepped inside the door or, if they have, must have been high on something given the list of things they saw which didn’t exist in reality. We’re not talking debateable issues like whether or not the place has been dusted but things like broken windows which clearly aren’t broken.
The review facilities run by the likes of Booking.com are in a different league. To my mind, the problem with them is that they generally don’t offer a facility for hotel management to comment on the reviews made. Since they also clearly have an interest in getting people into their hotels, the tendency is to allow management to have the negative comments deleted. Now, this gets rid of the idiotic comments as above but it also potentially allows unscrupulous hotels to artificially bump up their ratings by getting rid of the really negative comments (although, one hopes, that a genuinely bad hotel wouldn’t get away with that). Probably the most extreme example of this is HostelWorld (used by Ryanair and very popular) where the management can select which reviews and ratings they’d like to appear (they can’t edit them) so, naturally, it’s possible to manipulate your rating and some places would appear to do that thereby getting a rating of close to 100% vs a more reasonable 70-80%.
So, yes, let’s see if we can get rid of the bogus reviews but let’s not limit it to those of owners/managers who are inflating their rating but also the overlly negative reviews of unreasonable guests who blame everything that goes wrong on everyone else.
How to do that is the big question though. Anyone can create a hotmail account and get a review onto many sites without any confirmation that they’ve actually been a guest there. It’s clearly not viable for the majority of Internet sites to actually visit the hotels being commented on yet some kind of cross-check is definitely required and, at the moment, many sites don’t appear to even read the comments before they put them on.
Copyright © 2004-2014 by Foreign Perspectives. All rights reserved.How safe is it to quote your bank account details to strangers?
Many of the B&B and particularly gite owners accept payments by bank transfer to their account. What amazes me is that they never consider that it’s something of a risk to give your bank account details to a complete stranger and even more so when it’s a series of complete strangers.
If you think about this for a while you’ll realise that your bank account details are printed on your cheques but that’s not quite the same as you give cheques to people or organisations that you know. There is a safe way to do this though. Just quote a savings account number and, if you’re really paranoid about it, open a savings account in a bank that you don’t normally deal with.
Every time that I raise this issue, someone quotes their bank manager as having said that it’s perfectly safe to hand out your details in this way and that it’s impossible to take money out using only those details. Haven’t these people even heard of direct debits? After all, a direct debit uses exactly the same information as you quote to receive money. Now, I’m not suggesting that a fraudster is going to set up a direct debit and then withdraw money from your account using it but there are a number of very similar ways to do that. For example, if you care to give me YOUR bank details, I could set up a one-off transfer by simply looking up the address of your bank and faxing them the instructions to do that. You might think that wouldn’t work as they check the signatures, but actually they only check a small percentage of the signatures so it almost certainly would work. Then people say that it must be safe because the electicity company quotes their details for payments so how come someone hasn’t cleaned them out by now? They haven’t because they quote the number of their collection account and collection accounts reject electronic withdrawals.
Since a small business doesn’t have the option of a collection account the safest thing to do is to quote a savings account number as you can’t withdraw money electronically from a savings account.
Copyright © 2004-2014 by Foreign Perspectives. All rights reserved.Marketing our blog
Initially we just included our blog on the marketing lists for our other sites but quite quickly found out that a lot of places list blogs in a peculiar way or don’t list them at all so we’ve been looking around for other ways to get our blog known.The business of blogging is relatively new and so a lot of places aren’t quite sure what to do with them. Many site directories are set up on the basis that the sites on them are fairly static but that’s one thing that’s definitely not the case with active blogs. They also have the characteristic of being local news in many cases and whilst I’m sure it’ll be quite a while before we get mentioned on a news bulletin we are actually listed on one service which in turn feeds into Reuters, USA Today and FoxNews.
Each time a new entry is added various services such as Feedburner, Technorati and more specialised services like PingOMatic inform all the other news-type services that you’ve done that. The net effect of this is that you get the equivalent of a new listing every time you add an entry which can both produce an immediate flurry of hits on the blog and also helps the more gradual building up of hits from the normal search engines.
What’s also quite different from a normal website is that you get feedback and comments on what you said. For instance, a few weeks back I was speculating as to how many people were reading this blog, I was very surprised to have a reply from the Feedburner people themselves. There’s also much more interaction between the various bloggers than there is between people running up normal websites.
One “problem” with a blog is that you really have no idea how many people are actually reading it. The likes of feedburner return a count as to how many people are potentially subscribed to the blog but that doesn’t count those subscribed directly via the e-mail subscriptions and, on the whole, there doesn’t seem to be any 100% reliable way of counting those who reach entry.
What has really surprised me though is that somehow or other this blog has managed to get into the top 1/2 million blogs already which is pretty good going I think considering that I’ve only been doing it properly for six months or so.
Copyright © 2004-2014 by Foreign Perspectives. All rights reserved.

