A wrist slapping from Technorati
As you know, I was one of the first to repost the 2kbloggers list last Thursday and in common with Bob and Chino had my blog suspended from Technoratis listings temporarily (Angela by chance didn’t make the list clickable). It would have been rather more than a temporary suspension but for the words of wisdom from Bob.
Now, Technorati have gotten around to replying to us as to the reason for the suspension in a comment on Bob’s site. Seems that were a substantial number of the 2kbloggers to have similarly reposted the list, their whole ranking system would have become worthless. Their reasoning is that their system is intended to give high rankings to blogs which get a lot of relevant links.
Emm, guys€¦ if that’s the case, how come you allow the growth of blog reviews’ as a side-line to the likes of John Chow? For that matter, how come you allow the growth of blog review blogs at all? After all, the link that I have on this blog to bloggyaward is hardly a relevant outbound link to me, is it? (Although the words of wisdom from Mr Bloggy will be getting acted on in due course).
This isn’t to knock John Chow who, after all, is only out to make a buck online as are most of us. I’m just asking, how come it’s OK for him to run a long series of blog review’ competitions for his blog and thereby gather up hundreds if not thousands of inbound links, yet it’s not OK for those on the 2kblogger list to do the same?
To my mind, it highlights a severe weakness in the Technorati system. If they want the system to rank blogs on the basis of relevant links then those are the only links that they should count. They’re probably going to turn around and say that it’s impossible to distinguish a relevant link from an irrelevant one but that’s not the case. At a simplistic level, it would be relatively easy for them to only count links from site A to site B where A had more than one link to B. That in itself would exclude any irrelevant cross-linking that might happen from a spread of the 2kblogger list and the like.
After all, how long is it going to be before some awkward sod like myself decides to set up several thousand one page blogs all pointing to their main blog? For that matter, what will happen when (and it will be “when”, not “if”) someone runs up, say, 25,000 one page blogs and thereby ends up in the top 10 on Technorati?
All this, of course, aside from the freedom of speech angle. Actually, knowing bloggers, I’d be quite worried about that particular angle being taken up if I were in Technorati at the moment. There’s a LOT of support for freedom of expression out there in blog-land.
Ironically though, that 2kblogger post has actually attracted a growing number of relevant posts to my blog. So, yes, almost 1800 people now have a link from me that’s not too relevant but I correspondingly have links back which are relevant. In fact, I’ve found that looking at irrelevant’ blogs often turns up relevant links for me, hence all the click-throughs from me to those that look at my site.
Copyright © 2004-2014 by Foreign Perspectives. All rights reserved.
Hey Arnold!
Actually, I don’t care anymore at this Technorati Suspension. Yup, it is true that they have a flaw and their system is wanged up. (especially at that linking and tags thing) But we got more page visits than ever being listed on technorati. I admit that Technorati helped me somehow in spreading my blog. However, my blog gained more related links and more visitors than being ever part of technorati.
Although, I still know to myself that what I did is not wrong. Those links for me are not irrelevant. They are really part of the 2kbloggers. So there.
More power to Technorati. (yes.. I’m bitter..and that is sarcasm haha)
Hi Arnold, in light of your paid post I’ve just read this:
http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/how-to-report-paid-links/
It never sits still this internet does it!!!
All the best
Craig
What I wonder is what will happen when it’s not Technorati anymore but “Technorati, a Google company”. Either that’ll happen or Google’s getting up to something as we speak to make it an irrelevance.
Arnold,
We’re blogging and learning and because we’re mostly blogging because we have an inner ‘need’ to and so will continue to, no matter what the SEO powers that be get up to, we’ll continue to be here, relevant and even if slowly, expanding our voices’ reach.
Blessings, thanks for your link and I enjoyed your French immigration post the other night.
Angela.