Foreign Perspectives

Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

One of the basic tenets of the new politic of Northern Ireland that the various institutions were set up to encourage was the removal of religious bigotry and now we find that the Minister for Culture and Leisure has weighed in with the most extreme version of it that I’ve seen in a long time.

What he took upon himself was to write a letter suggesting (which, from the government minister in charge means essentially ordering) the Ulster Museum to incorporate creationism into its various displays. Not as a religious belief mind you, but as scientific fact (hence his referring to it as creationism rather than Christian belief).

Now, I don’t see that representing the influence of Christian (and Viking and Pagan) beliefs on the social development of Ulster as a problem. After all, there are significant Pagan burial grounds all over the place and we’re almost knee deep in Christian churches so obviously there’s been significant influence on the social development of the country over many centuries. In fact, those influences are shown at various points in the museum; the Christian ones aren’t so obvious as they’re so deeply ingrained in the culture.

What is wrong is to show the pseudo-science (false science to be truthful) that is creationism. This puts forward the notion that everything was created about 6000 years ago which is something of a problem as some of the exhibits in the museum are somewhat older than that. Millions of years older in many cases and billions of years older in some cases. Even the Egyptian exhibit would cause some issues.

The basic problem with his entire belief system is that it starts from the premise that evolution is only a theory. The problem is that there’s whole raft of science behind it which would need to be very wrong for it not to be right. For example, if the carbon dating used to date the fossils (millions of years old) is fundamentally wrong then it means that a number of fundamental physical theories are also wrong which would be a bit of a problem as some of them are required to control the operation of things like nuclear power stations. Similarly, it would mean that some fundamental principles behind biology are wrong and that’s a problem as some of those things that support evolution in biology are also used to create new vaccines. Creationism also has to deal with the “small” problem that for the first time man has created a life form that never existed before; that creation relies on using a number of those theories which support evolution.

But what about the other religions? If one is to be (incorrectly) represented then shouldn’t others be given equal treatment too? Nelson McCausland shouldn’t be permitted to try and impose his own fundamentalist Christian beliefs and should be considering his resignation speech this evening.

Those certainly seem to be good things on the whole, but what seemed very clear as the Queen’s speech ran on was that, by and large, it was a case of cancelling out just about every major piece of legislation that Labour has put through over the last 13 years or so.

Out goes the all-time black hole of expense which would have been ID cards and in comes the related limits on the DNA database and restrictions on CCTV. It’s nice to see that the big brother state is being rolled back in very concrete ways; hopefully they’ll rail back on some of the other less than libertarian ideas of the security services too.

Freedom of choice comes back to schooling with academies and to local authorities with more powers being devolved to them. Devolution in another form becomes safer through blocks on more powers being taken by Europe. Rolling back the state continues through reductions in the number of quangos and giving health professionals more say in the basic decision making.

Welfare reform is promised which is interesting as it’s something that the Conservatives have historically been scared of doing.

Pensions get some attention by regaining the link to earnings (good) and raising the state retirement age (not so good). Very good is the final acceptance that the government had a lot to do with the fall of Equitable Life and therefore should be paying compensation: this will take ages I’m sure and will definitely be complex as many of those due compensation have died.

A rather short speech which introduces a veritable mountain of legislation.

Despite the last minute wobbles, I suspect that this could prove to be one of the most stable of partnerships.

Why? Well, because for the first time in a very long time it will give the Liberals experience in government. One of the problems that they have had in recent times has been in convincing people that they had the strength to take part in government. It’s all very well standing on the sidelines in opposition and putting forward all kinds of ideas when you know that you will never have to take responsibility for implementing them. Taking an idea from the original concept through to implementation is something quite different and it’ll be interesting how the coalition takes to that.

So, at least in the medium term, there’ll be quite an incentive from the Liberals to make this work. On the other side of the fence, the Conservatives will have the advantage of having intimate access to the Liberal party’s ideas machine which has had the advantage of not having to worry about implementing their ideas and therefore has often came up with good ideas that would have been rejected at early stages by the other two main parties. Not all of those ideas will be workable but many of them may well be.

What will be a problem is the time about three years from now when the lights of the oncoming election will be seen. That pre-election period is going to be “interesting” for both parties and the working of the government generally.

It was a little wobbly this morning but at last Labour did the right thing and abandoned any thoughts of attempting to prolong their lame duck government. Most surprising was last night when John Reid came out and said directly that it simply wouldn’t be right for the Labour party to even think of some cobbled together coalition. It was into this morning though before the various spin doctors admitted that withdrawal was the only democratic thing to do.

This evening the new Conservative led government is in place or at least the Prime Minister is as he has yet to appoint his Ministers. That has the effect that he’s in full charge of the country this evening, albeit will a full complement of civil servants to keep a handle on it all. Changes in government are the only time when the UK is effectively run presidential style and it’s generally for a very brief period.

One final issue not yet resolved is the approval of the coalition by the Liberal Democrats which should happen later this evening all being well. Should all not be well and they reject it, we still have a government but a minority one.

At the changeover there were all the usual thank you gestures from both Brown and David Cameron. Not that anyone really believes them, of course.

Somehow I feel that this is nearing the end game.

Yesterday it became clear that Clegg doesn’t have enough from the Conservatives to suit him. The turning point on that seems to be a Liberal requirement to have proportional representation used in UK elections. On offer from the Conservatives was a referendum on the issue which does seem to be the correct approach. At the same time Labour came up with a guarantee to implement the change. Bearing in mind that this change is supposedly going to result in continual coalitions it’s clear that the current Labour government are only offering this as a last ditch way of staying in power.

Will David Cameron take the chance of ditching the Liberals and running with a minority government today? Probably not though I’d say he and his team are thinking of doing it very soon.