Archive for the ‘Immigration’ Category

The French Royal election campaign

Segolene RoyalIn years gone by the French were one of the most backward nations in the world with their use of the Internet. They stuck resolutely to their France-only Minitel system and, for the most part, refused to have anything to do with the American-dominated Internet.

That situation is changing very quickly. For example, whilst we had our first ever online reservation from a French person just two Summers ago, nowadays they are commonplace. So, it’s not surprising that the election campaign has gone online in an equally big way. Blogs are coming to be an expected part of that with the Royal campaign blog started early on and campaigning even taking place on SecondLife. Not so long ago, I’d have said that the SecondLife campaign office was totally crazy but apparently the swing against the recent EU referendum was started with the blog from an obscure teacher in Marseille so it would appear possible to swing public opinion in the real world from our vantage point in the virtual one, even in France.

But what about the real politics? Royal prefers intuition to ideology and is said to be good on the “small things” that arise in truly local politics and weak on the bigger picture. She is deliberately vague and promises to consult the people which are, in some ways, excellent approaches. The problem is that when one consults the people one finds out what the people want, not necessarily what they need.

Where she is more specific there are clear contradictions in her policies. In her economic policy objectives she wants to raise the minimum wage substantially, to abolish the CNE labour law (which makes hiring & firing easier for small companies) and to promote even more mass-unionisation (in an already highly unionised country), all clear job destroyers. Yet, on the other hand, she also hopes to create 500,000 youth jobs, generate training opportunities for longer term unemployed youths and even review the 35 hour week. Those two groups of objectives seem to be in clear opposition. Throughout her policies there is the underlying strand of more state intervention with talk of state aid (barely mentioned elsewhere in the world), increased tax on dividends (thus discouraging investment), state regulation of banking fees (no doubt to support the indigenous banks) and renationalisation of EDF/GDF.

What about Sarkozy though? Well, to our eyes he appears more of a “normal” western European politician with his hopes to encourage the job creators to return home to France, to cut taxes and generally free up the state burden on the population. However, he’s unlikely to do much about the farming subsidies or go far to address France’s head in the sand approach to globalisation.

The problem that both face on behalf of the country is that, whilst they might complain about their taxes, the French like their cozy system of benefits and jobs for life. After all, why would anyone want to bother working a 40 hour week when they could work a 35 hour week for the same salary? For that matter, if Royal’s proposal to take unemployment benefit to 90% of that received from one’s previous job, why would anyone want to work at all? This approach is quite typically French in totally ignoring what the rest of the world is getting up to. That, of course, is the main problem with French politics. For example, when an attempt was made to make it easier to hire & fire young people in early 2006, the predictable result was riots in the streets and, equally predictably, a climbdown by the government. Whilst the people needed jobs, what they wanted were jobs for life.

I suspect that this time around the French people will get what they want which is pretty much what Royal has on offer. However, what they need is Sarkozy, if he’s strong enough to push through his policies in spite of certain opposition to a number of them.

Copyright © 2004-2014 by Foreign Perspectives. All rights reserved.

Winter in the south of France: global warming in action?

Vineyards in the snow

The photo shows the kind of weather we were expecting to get this February but in reality that photo was taken in January 2006.

Naturally, everyone went out and bought snow chains after the snow that you see in the photo. In fact, that is the only day that we have had snow in three years. All that snow landed in a matter of hours one day in January last year, was completely gone the next day and a few days afterwards we were back into the t-shirts.

This year we’ve not had any snow yet and have been in the t-shirts almost every day since February last year. Even the usual wind that comes mainly in the Winter in this area has kept away so we’ve been eating lunch outside nearly all of the time. Even more peculiar is the sight of the locals sunning themselves in the cafés around the town when ordinarily they wear really serious Winter clothing from mid-September through to the following May but with temperatures regularly over 20c for ages, even they are starting to adjust their habits.

Since we’re now equipped with snow chains, we were hoping to head out to one of the local ski resorts a few times over the Winter but even they have only been opened relatively recently compared to the more normal November to March. Net effect is that instead of ski-ers staying with us we’ve had normal tourists looking for somewhere a little warmer than more northerly parts of Europe.

Copyright © 2004-2014 by Foreign Perspectives. All rights reserved.

Language and culture: are they inextricably interlinked?

I participated in quite an extended debate on an excellent English language website written by a French expat living in America recently.

Along the way a number of issues were raised which I never really thought a great deal about before and it was interesting to see a French view expressed on many of them. One in particular was their view that you just couldn’t separate language from culture. From a French perspective the two are indivisible: you can’t have French culture without it being in the French language.

In the English speaking world the two are quite separate. India clearly isn’t an Anglo-saxon culture yet they speak English and even Hong-Kong remained very much a Chinese culture even when it was a British colony. Yet, the French would seemingly argue that both India and Hong-Kong are Anglo-Saxon.

Even the French world has examples of the separation these days. France24 put out a full English-language news service yet it is still quite clearly a French channel. Perhaps the most interesting example though is of the TV series Nikita which although based on the French film of the same name was made entirely in English yet still came across as a French series.

The other thing that I found odd was that they seemingly considered all English speakers to be Anglo-Saxon which I suppose is reasonable if you start with the premise that language and culture aren’t separable.

It was also a little strange to come across a group of people from a fairly major language grouping who were so defensive about their language. You’dt from a group speaking very much a minority language, not from speakers of one of the top 15 world languages. For instance, they have a law that says all government services must of be offered in French. OK, it’s France so you would expect them to be in French but why should that require a law?

Copyright © 2004-2014 by Foreign Perspectives. All rights reserved.

Is neutrality ethical in wartime?

Swiss Flag Frenchless in France raised the issue of how ethical it really was for Switzerland to be neutral during the war.

I’ve always thought of it being a noble thing to be neutral but as she pointed out there is another side to that neutrality. Swizerland turned away many refugees that could have escaped persecution under the Nazi regime. Yes, there were many Swiss who did help a great many refugees but as a nation they rejected all of them. Aside from that there is the issue as to what would have happened had the war gone Hitler’s way. Would that neutrality have been respected had Switzerland found itself surrounded by Nazi occupied countries? I think not.

I’m sure that it is useful to have a neutral venue like Swizerland to hold peace talks and the like but it seems to me that it can come at a terrible price during wartime.

Copyright © 2004-2014 by Foreign Perspectives. All rights reserved.

When are restaurants open in France?

If you go by the signs, they are open from as early as 8am to as late as 11pm or so. However, if you try to order a meal it’s a very different story. The most common times are from about 11am to 10pm but in practice almost all such restaurants only serve food from noon to 1.30pm and from about 7.30pm to 9pm. Even the French fast-food chain Quick only serves its full menu a little bit outside the noon to 2pm period so you can’t even have a burger at 3pm if you wanted one unless you go to McDonalds.We still get caught out by those hours. A coffee-shop (salon du thé) opened recently in Estagel and we’ve been meaning to try it out for ages. We were running a little behind schedule on Sunday so thought that it would be a good time to get a sandwich or something from them as they had a sign saying that they opened from noon ’til 10pm. What happened when we turned up at 3pm? The waitress came out and said that they weren’t serving meals until the evening. The funny thing is that we were their only customers that day so the five staff will once again be sitting almost all day doing nothing. In fact, we’ve only ever seen the staff inside so perhaps we were their first ever customers.Perhaps we’ll be more lucky with the kebab shop but somehow I can’t see it.

Actually, I dispair of the local cafes in general. One of them refuses to serve foreigners unless the waitress hears them speaking French and another is openly hostile towards them yet both are increasingly dependent on the tourist trade.

 

 

Copyright © 2004-2014 by Foreign Perspectives. All rights reserved.
Archives