Foreign Perspectives

Going by the debate last night, immigration would be a very easy thing to control (so, why hasn’t Labour done so already?).

However, it’s not nearly so simple as it appeared in the debate. The problem specifically is in the measurement of immigration and the definition of an immigrant. As far as the immigration goes, counting is a very dodgy affair as it relies on people falling into normal categories so that they can actually be counted. The snag is that significant numbers of people don’t fall into neat little boxes like that. Take the travelling communities that seem to be forming an increasingly sizeable chunk of immigrants (or at least the more noticeable ones): in some cases a number of these people will escape the statistical net. Wendy, for example, lived in France for over five years yet never received any official letters and therefore was never recorded as officially having been there (which, I’m sure, will cause us problems at some point).

The definition of what a migrant is is quite difficult too. In most peoples’ eyes, it’s anyone not British (though the Irish would take issue with that!) yet on official stats, it’s only those who are not European. Therein lies the problem as significant numbers of “problem” communities have arisen in some areas of the UK consisting entirely of European migrants from economically poorer regions of Europe. In fact, they’re the kind of people who wouldn’t get in with a normal visa if they needed one. Some councils have so many of these non-migrants that the quality of local services is dropping dramatically as they simply don’t have the resources to deal with such an influx of people in such a short time.

The snag is that the number of these non-migrants aren’t something that can be controlled by the UK government. All the talk of schemes in Australia and Canada where immigrants are allocated to regions within the country is irrelevant in these cases. Just as the Australian government can’t tell a Sydney born person that they have to live in Western Australia so the UK government can’t tell a Bulgarian that they have to live in Yorkshire.

In reality the problem is one of Europe’s making. The countries most recently added in to Europe had economies that were just too far out of whack with the countries that were already in Europe. The net effect of that is that clearly it was to the advantage of citizens of those countries to move (not migrate) to richer European countries and naturally many did exactly that. European problems need European solutions but the snag in this case that the only short term solution would be to set migration quotas which would be contrary to the free movement ethos and difficult to implement, alongside a long term move to elevate the poorer economies to the level of the richer ones or, rather, to speed that up as it will happen in due course.