Foreign Perspectives

In these days when virtually everyone books their accommodation online it’s particularly important to read the small-print regarding cancelling your trip or simply not turning up at all at your accommodation.

If you simply don’t turn up almost all hotels will charge you for the first night of your stay but some resort style hotels will charge you for the entire stay. In both cases this is a non-refundable charge.

However, you don’t necessarily need to pay it. In most cases, if you call the hotel a day in advance of your stay you’ll generally not have to pay anything further. Even cancelling the same day can sometimes save you money. For example, although we can charge for a noshow unless the reservation is cancelled a day in advance, in reality we waive this if we can get someone else for the room following the cancellation. Incidentally, it’s really not necessary for you to make up some excuse to explain your cancellation: hotels have heard them all before and it’ll make no difference as to whether or not they charge you.

Do watch any deposit payments that you’ve made though as in many instances these are kept by the reservation system that you used and are usually not refundable. If you find a hotel listed on a reservation system it’s usually worthwhile to contact them directly as this will save you the booking fee and you may get a discount too.

You might think that these “noshow” charges are just profiteering on the part of the hotel. They aren’t. Whenever you make a guaranteed reservation online the hotel is obliged to keep the room for you even if other people turn up asking for a room. In some cases we have turned away as many as a dozen couples looking for a room because our last room was subject to a guaranteed reservation only to find out that the people who’d booked it never turned up.

And a final plea… read the description of the hotel and particularly its location. Hotels are usually listed by “resort” which means that all hotels within about 25 miles of a city will come up as being attached to that city. This means that hotels well into the country are listed as associated with cities. Cancelling because you discover that a hotel you expected to be in the city centre is actually in the country doesn’t save a “noshow” charge if you only discover that when you arrive in the city.

Thanks to the “short” list of courses that I ran up last summer whilst thinking about what I do following the modern languages degree, I find that there’s quite a lot of scope for shortening the period to pick up the first two degrees from the overall sequence.

TWO degrees? Yeah, I know, it seems a little crazy to be thinking of doing two degrees at once but when I ran through the list of possibilities I ended up with the bulk of two separate degrees worth of courses having my little stars beside them. Thus over the next 10 years or so I will be working my way through both a psychology and a physics degree along with a few totally unrelated courses that seem close to forming a history degree.

Anyway, because the two degree programmes aren’t actually designed to be taken at once there’s quite a lot of scope for me to play with the scheduling of the various courses. Moving more than five years out is way too complicated as OU courses come and go but looking at the next three or four years there are still oodles of viable sequences that can be created and a surprising amount of time to be saved.

For instance, my original plan was basically to do the first major physics sequence followed by the first major psychology course sequence and finishing up with the archaeology course. That results in a completion date of December 2014. However, it’s actually possible to complete the same sequence of courses in December 2012 by changing the order slightly and removing what would have been quite long gaps between courses at several points.

Sadly, I don’t think it’ll be possible to shave so much time off in later years though there’s at least one spot where a year can be saved several years from now.

One of the problems that I have in choosing which courses to go for is that a number of those that I’d quite like to do fall into the category of “difficult” for one reason or another.

In some cases that’s not so bad I can, for instance, work up to the astrophysics course by starting with a very doable maths course and working up to astrophysics itself via a series of stepping stone courses. So, in principle, the astrophysics is quite an achievable goal for me. However, some of the other courses don’t have those easy stepping stones and, for example, the human biology course that I’ve pencilled in for next year looks like it will be rather difficult in a number of areas. The snag is that in that particular case human biology is itself the stepping stone that I felt I needed for biological psychology which I’ll be doing in a few years time.

One plus point is that, at the moment, the most difficult courses seem to be 30 pointers rather than the 60 point courses that I’ve been doing the last few years. So, in principle, if I do hit a really rough patch with one then I should be able to devote more time to it.

Still, if I was able to manage level 3 French, I’m sure that I’ll be able to get through a couple of level 2 biology courses.

One of the problems with doing a degree with the OU is that it’s a very long drawn out affair taking anything from six years upwards in most cases. That long period in turns means that there can be quite a turnover in the courses available during the course of one’s degree.

For example, when I was going through my (far too long) list of potential courses for the next couple of years recently I found that there’s quite a lot of them that will have reached the end of their life before I’ll have gotten around to doing them. That’s not really so much of a problem as it might appear to be in that the majority of courses are replaced by updated versions of what went before. For example, whilst I’ve got DSE212 Exploring Psychology in my schedule since it only runs to 2011 I may well be doing whatever its successor is. Where it is an issue is that the psychology courses come with expiry dates so that 10 years after a version of a course ceases, you can’t count it towards a psychology degree eg in my case the Child Development course that I’m currently doing will expire in 2023 because this edition of the course will only run to 2012. Granted, that 10 year plus validity isn’t usually a major problem in that the degree programmes generally run over around six years but it means that you can’t really take a break from the psychology degree as easily as you can for other degree programmes.

What’s a little more disconcerting is that A251 World Archaeology which was only introduced last year and which went straight into my short-list as it sounds brilliant is finishing the year before I’d have been doing it. Why that should be so I don’t know for sure but the extreme range of comments about it (“best course ever” through to “total waste of time”) might have something to do with that. If that’s the case, then any rewrite could be substantially different than the current course. Unfortunately, I’ll probably not know whether or not there’s going to be a successor to it for a couple of years so if I want to do it, I’ll have to rejig my schedule yet again.

I raised this question during one of the recent tutorials and was instantly shot down!

However, whilst it’s not a “girly” course in terms of difficulty (I’m finding it harder going than even level 3 French!), it is a “girly” course in the sense that it seems to attract more than the usual number of females for a course. Even though I’ve been doing language courses, a more typically female type of course, I found it very noticeable that the percentage of females was much higher than normal in the Child Development course that I’m doing at the moment. If tutorial attenders are any kind of guideline it seems to be around 80% female.

Of course, the reason for that is quite clear when you look at the range of degree and diplomas that this course counts towards even before you consider that anything with “child” in the title is still, even today, considered to be more in the female domain than in the male one. Those qualifications feeding into it are variations on the theme of what’s known as Early Years ie essentially considering the care and education of young children. Those occupations attract more than their fair share of females so thus it’s only natural that qualifications in that line would do the same.

The thing is though that it’s one of the more interesting courses around for guys. After all, whilst arguably girls are, for one reason or another, generally brought up with the expectation that they’ll be looking after the kids (yeah, I know, sexist but still largely true despite that), the guys tend, on the whole, to miss out on that kind of thing. Sure they’ll play with toy soldiers but you don’t see many little boys playing with dolls generally yet that’s one of the ways that you can get used to considering the needs of a baby. Whilst this course isn’t a childcare course as such I found that it filled in a lot of the gaps in childcare lore that guys tend to miss out on as they grow up.

Don’t underestimate the level of difficulty in it though! This course comes with one serious workload and is definitely not a course to be taken lightly.